Harvard Sociology Literature Review Example: Social Capital & Educational Inequality

5 sociology-specific scoring dimensions (combined with Harvard)

Dimension Poor signal Strong signal

1 Concept lineage "Social capital = friends help you" Traces Bourdieu 1986 (cultural/class embedded) → Coleman 1988 (closure enables obligations/norms) → Putnam 2000 (civic stock) as distinct traditions

2 Mechanism of reproduction "Poor kids lack connections" Distinguishes network closure (Coleman) from convertibility of parental ties to school leverage (Ream & Palardy)

3 Stratification axis Class only Class (Ream & Palardy) + race/ethnicity (Perna & Titus) + civic era (Putnam) separated

4 Harvard mechanics APA &/double-quote/et al. italic and/single-quote/roman et al./place retained

5 Precise gap "Need more social capital" Names meso-level mechanism × outcome × confounder (school resources, neighbourhood, mobility)

Strong draft (Harvard / Cite Them Right 12th, annotated)

[Thesis / scope] Social capital explains part but not all of educational inequality: it is not a uniform resource but a class- and race-stratified asset whose convertibility—not merely its volume—determines who converts ties into achievement. [Narrative, foundational] Coleman (1988) defined social capital through three forms—obligations and expectations, information channels, and social norms—arguing that closure of the adult social network (parental presence, neighbour watch, school-community overlap) enables these forms; its absence, not just low income, drives dropout. [Civic scale] Putnam (2000) scaled the concept to the civic stock of whole societies, documenting US decline in associational membership, trust, and parental public-sphere engagement since the 1960s; his corollary is that communities with thinner social capital show weaker school performance, independent of per-pupil spend. [Race-stratified enrolment] Perna and Titus (2005) tested the enrolment stage using NELS:88 (9,810 students, 1,006 schools) and found parental involvement as social capital raised two-year and four-year enrolment odds overall, but the effect varied by race/ethnicity—African-American and Hispanic families held lower average stocks and attended schools whose networks carried fewer enrolment-relevant ties, producing a double deficit. [Class-stratified convertibility] Ream and Palardy (2008) pushed past volume to convertibility: using ELS:2002 longitudinal data (with Add Health as a comparative context), they showed middle-class parents held more parental social capital but its educational utility (e.g., belief in collective efficacy to shape school policy) was not strictly monotonic with class—working-class parents' ties were less convertible to school leverage even when present. [Synthesis] The review-grade claim is therefore three-tiered: (a) social capital volume is class- and race-stratified (Coleman/Putnam/Perna-Titus); (b) convertibility not volume does the reproductive work (Ream-Palardy); (c) school-level network resources moderate whether family ties pay off. [Precise gap] What remains untested is whether convertibility gaps persist net of school resources and neighbourhood mobility in non-US, more centralised schooling systems (e.g., Germany, Japan), where parent-school leverage operates through different channels—a gap that matters because Ream and Palardy's (2008) convertibility finding may be US-specific to decentralised school governance.

[Evidence-quality subsection] Design lineage matters. [Narrative] Coleman (1988) is a theoretical synthesis with HS&B illustrative tables—not a test, but the construct anchor. [Book] Putnam (2000) is a secondary-data synthesis (DDB/GSS trends) with ecological correlation, not individual causality. [Parenthetical] Perna and Titus (2005) supply the multilevel quantitative test (individual × school, HLM on NELS) for the enrolment stage. [Narrative, 2 authors] Ream and Palardy (2008) upgrade to two-panel comparison (ELS:2002 primary + Add Health comparative) separating availability from convertibility. [Synthesis] GRADE-style: low certainty for causal claims (all observational), moderate for the stratified-volume finding, moderate for the convertibility distinction (replicated across two panels). [Gap restatement] Future reviews must not pool "social capital" as one variable—volume, closure, convertibility, and school-network mediation are four different constructs.

[Policy subsection] Translation fails when volume is confused with convertibility. [Narrative] Programmes that "build social capital" by creating parent associations assume closure = leverage; Ream and Palardy (2008) show middle-class closure converts, working-class closure may not—so the same intervention widens the gap it intends to close. [Precise gap] A literature review recommending "community cohesion" programmes without naming governance channel (decentralised vs centralised) × convertibility mechanism will overstate transfer from US findings to NHS/Nordic contexts.

In-text citation audit (Harvard / CTR 12th, convention locked from 11a)

• 1 author: Coleman (1988) / (Coleman, 1988)

• 1 author book: Putnam (2000) / (Putnam, 2000)

• 2 authors: Perna and Titus (2005) / (Perna and Titus, 2005) — and, never &

• 2 authors, repeat: Ream and Palardy (2008) — Harvard does not use et al. for 2 authors; both names repeat every citation

• Multi-source (alphabetical): (Coleman, 1988; Perna and Titus, 2005; Putnam, 2000; Ream and Palardy, 2008) — C < P (Perna) < P (Putnam, e < u) < R

• Page number: (Coleman, 1988, p. S98) — supplement pages keep the S prefix

Reference list (Harvard / Cite Them Right 12th)

Reference list

Coleman, J. S. (1988) 'Social capital in the creation of human capital', American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), pp. S95–S120. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/228943

Perna, L. W. and Titus, M. A. (2005) 'The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: an examination of racial/ethnic group differences', Journal of Higher Education, 76(5), pp. 485–518. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2005.0023

Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Ream, R. K. and Palardy, G. J. (2008) 'Reexamining social class differences in the availability and the educational utility of parental social capital', American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), pp. 238–273. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308643

Format checks (CTR 12th): • "Reference list", alphabetized C → P (Perna) → P (Putnam) → R

• Surname, Initial(s). — Coleman, J. S., Perna, L. W., Ream, R. K.

• Single quotes on article titles, sentence case; journals italicized title case

• 94(Supplement), pp. S95–S120 (en dash, S prefix kept); 76(5), 45(2)

• et al. roman (none needed—max 2 authors); 2-author works repeat both names every citation

• Book: Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster. — place: publisher retained, title sentence case

• Available at: https://doi.org/... — no access date

Source count note: this page demonstrates the Harvard layer with 4 anchor sources (Coleman 1988, Putnam 2000, Perna & Titus 2005, Ream & Palardy 2008). A production page would add Bourdieu (1986) 'The forms of capital' (for the lineage opening) and Lin (2001) Social Capital (for the network-structural critique)—both translate cleanly into Harvard. The 4-source core carries the argument; expansion is mechanical.

What changed: poor draft → strong Harvard draft

Element Poor draft Strong Harvard draft (above)

Concept lineage One "social capital" blob Bourdieu→Coleman→Putnam distinguished

Coleman mechanism "Closure" as standalone Closure enables obligations, information channels, norms (Coleman's three forms)

Mechanism "Connections help" Closure (Coleman) vs Convertibility (Ream-Palardy) separated

Stratification Class only Class + race/ethnicity + civic-era axes

Perna & Titus 2005 Mislabeled as Social Science Research Corrected to J Higher Educ 76(5) 485–518

Ream & Palardy 2008 "First-gen persistence" (vague) Corrected to AERJ 45(2) 238–273, convertibility thesis; ELS:2002 primary

Citation mechanics APA &/double-quote/et al. and/single-quote/roman/place retained

2-author rule Ream et al. (wrong) Ream and Palardy every time

Gap "More social capital needed" Convertibility × governance channel × non-US centralised systems

5 fatal signals (Harvard × Sociology)

1. Citing Perna and Titus (2005) as Social Science Research — it is JHE 76(5); the SSR piece is a different Perna/Titus article on community-college finance.

2. Writing Ream et al. (2008) — Harvard uses Ream and Palardy (2008) for two authors; et al. is for 3+.

3. Using & in citations ((Perna & Titus, 2005)) — Harvard uses and.

4. Italicizing et al. or double-quoting article titles.

5. Treating social capital as one variable—ignoring that Coleman (closure), Putnam (civic stock), Perna-Titus (race-stratified enrolment), Ream-Palardy (convertibility) measure different things.

Rewrite Checklist (Harvard × Sociology)

1. Open by separating Bourdieu's class-embedded capital from Coleman's closure-enables-norms and Putnam's civic stock—never merge them.

2. Anchor with Coleman (1988) for the construct (three forms + closure), Putnam (2000) for civic-scale decline, Perna and Titus (2005) for race-stratified enrolment (NELS, JHE 76(5)), Ream and Palardy (2008) for convertibility (AERJ 45(2), ELS:2002 primary).

3. Distinguish volume (how much) from convertibility (whether it pays off in a given governance context).

4. Convert ≥40% parentheticals to narrative; and for 2 authors; no et al. for 2-author works; roman et al. for 3+.

5. Audit reference list: single quotes, italics journal, Place: Publisher for books, Available at: https://doi.org/..., no access date.

6. Alphabetize by first-author surname; list all authors (max 2 here, so both always listed).

7. Close gap with meso mechanism × outcome × confounder (school resources, neighbourhood mobility) × governance context (decentralised US vs centralised EU/Asia).

8. Verify every DOI resolves.

FAQ

Why is Perna & Titus 2005 in JHE and not Social Science Research? Because the specific article "The Relationship Between Parental Involvement as Social Capital and College Enrollment…" was published in Journal of Higher Education, 76(5), 485–518 (2005), doi:10.1353/jhe.2005.0023. Perna and Titus did publish related work in Social Science Research (e.g., on community-college finance), which is the likely source of the memory conflation—but the social-capital-and-enrolment piece is JHE.

Is Ream & Palardy 2008 about first-generation persistence? No. The 2008 AERJ 45(2):238–273 article is titled "Reexamining social class differences in the availability and the educational utility of parental social capital"—its dependent variable is not first-gen persistence but the class gradient in convertibility of parental ties to school leverage, using ELS:2002 longitudinal data (with Add Health as comparative context). Ream's first-gen work appears elsewhere (e.g., Ryan & Ream 2016).

Do I use et al. for two authors in Harvard? No. Cite Them Right (and Harvard generally) keeps both names for 2-author works on every citation: (Ream and Palardy, 2008), never (Ream et al., 2008). et al. starts at 3 authors, and even then only after the first full listing.

How does this page relate to 11c Harvard × Education? /harvard-education-literature-review-example explains inequality from inside the pupil (mindset, intervention, achievement). This page explains the same inequality from outside (family networks, class closure, civic stock, school-governance convertibility). Read together they bracket the individual↔structure dialectic that a strong education-sociology review must hold.

Can I reuse this review's citations? No. Use the structure and Harvard mechanics as a model; replace sources with your own verified search, and confirm each DOI resolves.

/harvard-literature-review-example · /literature-review-example-annotated-sample#by-citation-style · /harvard-education-literature-review-example · /ieee-cs-survey-literature-review-example

Continue the research workflow with Acade

Acade can help you search for literature, organize evidence notes, build a synthesis outline, and revise citation-supported academic writing. It cannot guarantee source accuracy or replace your reading, methodological judgment, institutional rules, or responsibility for the submitted work.

Tell Acade your topic, discipline, citation style, evidence requirements, and assignment constraints, then ask it to help organize the next verifiable research step.